SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1533

KARAMJIT SINGH
Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Mr. C.L. Pawar AAG, Punjab, Mr. Munish Puri

Table of Content
1. allegations underlying fir for anticipatory bail. (Para 1 , 2)
2. nature of dispute: civil vs. criminal. (Para 3 , 4)
3. considerations for anticipatory bail ruling. (Para 5 , 6)
4. breach of contract does not equal criminal intent. (Para 7)
5. grant of anticipatory bail allowed. (Para 8)

Judgment

Mr. Karamjit Singh, J.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail in case having FIR No. 18 dated 25.02.2022, registered under Sections 417 and 420 IPC at Police Station Division No.1, Pathankot.

2. As per the allegations recorded in the FIR, the petitioner and his father Harbans Lal entered into an agreement to sell the property in question with complainant Deepak Kumar and in this regard agreement to sell was executed between the parties on 02.07.2019 and the entire sale consideration of Rs.46,00,000/- has been received by the vendors from the complainant. That thereafter Harbans Lal died while the petitioner failed to execute the sale deed in favour of the complainant, who is his real brother and the petitioner also failed to return the sale consideration which was received by him and his father at the time of e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top