ANOOP CHITKARA
Ramandeep Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. -
FIR No.
Dated
Police Station
Sections
759
20.12.2020
DLF Assand, District Karnal
406, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC
1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 CrPC seeking bail.
2. In paragraph 9 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.
3. Petitioner's counsel prays for bail by imposing any stringent conditions.The petitioner contends that the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.
4. The State opposes bail.
REASONING:
5. The petitioner allegedly received Rs. 22,54,244/- for the land acquisition by impersonating Ramanndeep Kaur d/o Sukhwant Singh, the actual claimant.
6. As per paragraph 7 of the bail petition, the petitioner is in custody since 30-1- 2022. Given the amount involved viz-a-viz pre-trial custody, coupled with the primafacie analysis of the nature of allegations, and the other factors peculiar to this case, there would be no justifiability for further pre-trial incarceration at this stage, subject to the compliance of terms and conditions mentioned in this order. Furthermore, the petitioner is a first offend
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.