GIRISH AGNIHOTRI
ABW Suncity – Appellant
Versus
Tarun Malik – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GIRISH AGNIHOTRI, J.
1. The matter has been taken up through video conferencing on account of restrictions due to outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic.
2. This order shall dispose of the following Arbitration cases and review applications collectively by way of a common order:
| RA-CR-18-2021 IN ARB-48-2021 | ARB-48-2021 |
| RA-CR-19-2021 IN ARB-16-2021 | ARB-16-2021 |
| RA-CR-20-2021 IN ARB-45-2021 | ARB-45-2021 |
| RA-CR-21-2021 IN ARB-25-2021 | ARB-25-2021 |
| RA-CR-22-2021 IN ARB-26-2021 | ARB-26-2021 |
| RA-CR-23-2021 IN ARB-27-2021 | ARB-27-2021 |
| RA-CR-24-2021 IN ARB-28-2021 | ARB-28-2021 |
| RA-CR-25-2021 IN ARB-52-2021 | ARB-52-2021 |
| RA-CR-27-2021 IN ARB-39-2021 | ARB-39-2021 |
3. For the sake of facts, order is being passed in RA-CR-25-2021 in/and ARB-52-2021 and for the sake of facts, reference is also being made to ARB-52-2021 and ARB-25-2021.
4. Learned counsel for the review-applicant/appellant-respondent submits that the written arguments submitted by the respondents in ARB-52-2021 be treated the common stand of the respondents in all cases.
5. Learned counsel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.