SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Mahipal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
1. The petitioners seek relief for the quashing of notifications, as became respectively issued under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1894’) and which become respectively enclosed in Annexure P-1 and P-2. The further relief, as asked for in the instant writ petition, relates to the quashing of the award (Annexure P-3).
2. However, since it becomes unfolded from a reading of the order made by this Court on 02.03.2022, relevant part whereof becomes extracted hereinafter, that then the learned counsel for the petitioners rather restricted his prayer to the disputed lands being released from acquisition, thus in terms of Section 101-A of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 2013’):
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.