SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 134

ARCHANA PURI
SML Isuzu Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Harjinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: M.S. Sachdev.
For the Respondent: Ish Puneet Singh.

JUDGMENT :

ARCHANA PURI, J.

1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 23.04.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Court below, whereby, an application filed by the petitioners under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, for rejection of the plaint, has been dismissed.

2. The essential facts, as culled from the paper-book are as follows:

    That, initially, respondent-plaintiff had filed a suit against the petitioners-defendants, thereby, seeking declaration qua the legality and validity of the order dated 04.08.2018, with regard to termination of his services. Besides the same, also respondent-plaintiff sought issuance of mandatory injunction to re-instate him in the services of the defendants, w.e.f. 04.08.2018, with all back wages and all other consequential benefits.

3. It is the claim of the respondent-plaintiff that he was appointed as Junior Management trainee vide appointment letter dated 11.05.1991. He had been continuously working with the defendant-company and plaintiff was promoted to the post of Deputy Manager w.e.f. 01.10.2012 and further, promoted to the post of Manager w.e.f. 01.04.2017. However, services of the plaintiff were terminated on 04.08.2018, without provi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top