Back
ARVIND KUMAR VERMA
Mrigendra Jyoti Sonwani – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
ORDER :
Invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and impugning legality, validity and correctness of the order dated 01.05.2019 issued by the respondent No.3-Managing Director, whereby the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:
10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly direct the respondent No.3 Managing Director CGMSC Ltd. To regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of “Executive Engineer.
10.3 Any other relief/reliefs, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.
10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue writ, order or direction for quashing of the termination order dated 01.05.2019 (Annexure P/18) passed by the respondent.
2. Facts of the case in brief, are that the respondent had issued an advertisement (Annexure P/4) for appointment of Executive Engineer and as per the terms and conditions in Clause 3 & 4 of the advertisement, the appointment
The court upheld the termination of a contractual employee as valid, emphasizing that rights are governed by the contract terms, and principles of natural justice do not apply in the same manner to c....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
