SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 216

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUVIR SEHGAL, J.
Jaswant Singh – Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M No. 19494 of 2022
Decided On : 31-07-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Abdul Aziz.
For the Respondent: Kunwarbir Singh.

Imposition of onerous conditions for the release of confiscated property is disapproved by the court.

Headnote:

Punjab Excise Act - Modification of Order - Sections 61, 78 (2) - Third proviso to Section 78 (2) - CWP-24941-2019 - CWP No. 24941 of 2019 - CWP No. 18946 of 2019 - Punjab Excise (Second Amendment) Act, 2017 - Darshan Singh vs. State of Punjab - Keshab Narayan Banerjee and Another vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1985 SC 166 - Sandeep Jain vs. National Capital of Delhi, (2002) 2 SCC 66

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner seeks modification of order directing to furnish bank guarantee of Rs.7 lacs for release of car confiscated under Punjab Excise Act, 1914.

Finding of the Court:

Court sets aside the condition of furnishing bank guarantee of Rs.7 lacs and directs petitioner to furnish security equivalent to Rs.3.5 lacs with two solvent sureties.

Issues: Imposition of onerous condition for release of confiscated vehicle, challenge to the amended proviso to Section 78 (2) of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914.

Ratio Decidendi: The condition imposed by the Trial Court is onerous and similar conditions have been disapproved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in previous cases.

Final Decision: Condition of furnishing bank guarantee of Rs.7 lacs set aside, petitioner directed to furnish security equivalent to Rs.3.5 lacs with two solvent sureties. Court calls for a status report from the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise and Taxation, Government of Punjab.

JUDGMENT :

SUVIR SEHGAL, J.

1. By way of present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner is seeking modification of order dated 08.07.2021, Annexure P-2, passed by learned JMIC, Patiala, whereby petitioner has been directed to furnish bank guarantee of Rs.7 lacs with one surety of the like amount, besides other conditions, for the release of the car on suparadari.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR No. 139 dated 30.05.2021 has been lodged for offence under Sections 61, 78 (2) of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 at Police Station Anaj Mandi, District Patiala, Annexure P-1, on the basis of secret information. A police barricade was set up and Jaswant Singh alias Satti and Parveen Kumar alias Prince were apprehended with 660 bottles of liquor while travelling in a Verna car bearing Registration No. PB-19 J-6183.

3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is the registered owner of the car, has been implicated as an accused and has been released on bail. He submits that petitioner’s application for release of the vehicle on supardari has been accepted by the Trial Court vide order, Annexure P-2, by imposing the conditions noticed above. Counsel asserts that petitioner had purchased the car in December, 2018 on loan from a bank. He has referred to the loan statement, Annexure P- 3, to fortify his submission. He submits that the resale value of the car is less than Rs. 3 lakh and the condition of furnishing of bank guarantee of Rs.7 lacs is harsh.

4. Opposing the petition, State counsel while referring to the stand taken by the State in the reply filed by way of an affidavit of Deputy Superintendent of Police, City-II, District Patiala, which is taken on record, submits that the Trial Court has imposed the condition of furnishing of bank guarantee in the light of Section 78 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914. While supporting the impugned order, he has also referred to the antecedents of the petitioner and submits that the final report has been submitted before the Trial Court, charges have been framed and the trial is underway.

5. I have considered the submissions made by counsel for the parties.

6. At the outset, argument of the State counsel deserves to be dealt with. Third proviso to Section 78 (2) of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 provides that during the pendency of the trial, confiscated conveyance can be released on submission of surety in the form of cash surety or bank guarantee equivalent to the value of the conveyance thereof. This provision came to be challenged before a Division Bench of this Court in CWP-24941-2019 titled as Darshan Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another petition, decided on 28.01.2020, which was disposed of by passing the following order:

    “(1) This order shall dispose of above mentioned two petitions. Since common questions of law and facts are involved therein, they are being decided by this common order.

(2) CWP No. 24941 of 2019 has been filed for quashing of notification No. 31-LEG/2017 dated 21.12.2017 (Annexure P-3) issued by respondent.

(3) And CWP No. 18946 of 2019 has been filed for quashing of the amended proviso to Section 78 (2) of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914 which has been introduced vide the Punjab Excise (Second Amendment) Act, 2017 (Annexure P- 1) whereby the security for release of the confiscated conveyance has been restricted to cash security or bank guarantee and for quashing of order dated 18.04.2019 (Annexure P-5) passed by Sh. Amrish Kumar, Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jagraon.

(4) Today learned State counsel states that he has received instructions that the State is willing to re-consider its stand.

(5) Counsel for the petitioner in CWP-18946-2019 points out that while this is a welcome step the fact is that the vehicles have been now retained in the police custody since March, 2013 and July, 2019 respectively and the balance of convenience is in favour of the petitioners and therefore, the vehicles should be released.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top