SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 409

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J.
Sanjay Rai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Anr. – Respondents
CRM-M-33501-2023 (O&M)
Decided On : 07-10-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanjay Rai, Petitioner-in-person, Mr. Sarabjit Singh Cheema, DAG, Punjab, Mr. P.S. Hundal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mrigank Sharma, Advocate, for the complainant, Mr. Kulwant Singh Boparai, Advocate, Amicus Curiae

The court ruled that self-proclaiming as a religious figure, intending to outraging communal sentiments, justified continued investigation under Section 295A IPC.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 295A - Quashing of FIR - Petition filed to quash FIR under Section 295A IPC, alleging intentional insult to religious feelings - The petition was dismissed as the allegations contained prima facie support for an offence - The court ruled that the applicant’s self-proclamation as the reincarnation of a religious figure could outrage the religious sentiments of a community and constituted grounds for investigation under Section 295A IPC. (Paras 1, 26, 36)

(B) Fundamental Rights - Freedom of Religion - The petitioner’s claim to be a Guru and the insinuation that traditional religions are commercialized led to public outrage and communal disharmony - The court emphasized the constitutional obligation to respect all religions and the duty of citizens to foster communal harmony while adhering to the established principles of Sikhism that acknowledge only Guru Granth Sahib as the living Guru post-Guru Gobind Singh Ji. (Paras 10, 12, 36)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner claimed to be the reincarnation of a prominent religious leader, asserting that existing religions are commercial enterprises. The FIR was lodged by a religious body alleging that such claims distort religious truths and hurt the sentiments of their followers, leading to communal discord.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner's statements, as recorded in public videos, could incite resentment within the Sikh community, warranting the continuation of the FIR and investigation into the claims made by the petitioner under Section 295A IPC.

Issues: The issues centered on whether the FIR adequately established the elements of the alleged offence under Section 295A IPC and the validity of the petitioner's claims in light of established Sikh doctrines.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner’s self-declarations contravened the recognized tenets of Sikhism and could intentionally insult the religious feelings of Sikhs thereby justifying the FIR’s continuance. The court underscored that matters reflecting community sentiments should be approached with extreme caution, reinforcing the right to uphold communal integrity.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. filing of petition to quash fir. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner claims to be reincarnation of guru nanak. (Para 3)
3. complainant alleges insult to sikh beliefs. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. importance of guru granth sahib emphasized. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
5. need for caution in freedom of speech. (Para 12 , 13)
6. court's duty to evaluate fir at investigation stage. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 26)
7. reiterating provisions of section 295a ipc. (Para 28 , 29)
8. court dismisses petition to quash fir. (Para 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, J. - The present is a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.152 dated 23.12.2022, under Section 295A of IPC, registered at Police Station Division E, District Police Commissionerate, Amritsar, Punjab and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

2. A translated copy of the aforesaid FIR which has been so attached by the petitioner alongwith the present petition as Annexure P-1 is reproduced as under:-

    'To, The Police Commissioner, Sri Amritsar. Subject:-Regarding complaint against Sanjay Rai son of R.M.Rai. Sir, the Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee, Sir Amritsar is lawful organisation constituted under Gurdawaras Act, 1925. Its Head Office is at Teja Singh Samundri Hall, Sri Amritsar Sahib and it has got the rights for doing legal administrative proceedings of very kind with this name as per Gurdwara Act. As per the report received from the Research Scholar of Shiromani Committee with regard to the complaint received from Sikhs and general public of the Illaqa against Sanjay Rai son of R.M. Rai, resident of Flat No.419, Phase-5, Mayur Vihar, Delhi at present resident of Ashram Village Palakhi, Police Station Bhogrwan, Teshil Indora, District Kanga (Himachal Pradesh) (Photocopy of which is enclsoed herewith). In the video sent by the people of that area the person named Sanjay Rai who by claiming himself as incarnation of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji's soul is falsely claiming of having twelfth sect and by staking the claim of having the entry of the soul of Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji in himself, and under the dirty policy of insulting Sikh community and by misleading the people is hurting the prestige and honour of Sikhs. Such mischievous persons promotes the hypocrisy and also looting the poor and innocent persons too. You are requested that by taking this matter seriously and while registering the case under appropriate sections agianst Sanjay Rai and his associate persons for insulting Guru Sahib, hurting the religious sentiments of Sangat, looting the innocent persons and for breaking the communal harmony in the society and for misleading the people and strict action be taken against them. Yours faithfully, Sd/- Partap Singh, Secretary, Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee, Sri Amritsar City'.

    Submissions made by petitioner in person

3. The petitioner appearing in person submitted that the present FIR was an abuse of the process of law since no offence is made out in the present case against the petitioner. He submitted that he is reincarnation of Guru Nanak Dev Ji which can be proved by his current actions and spiritual knowledge. He submitted that he lives in an Ashram under the name of Satlok Ashram at Village Palakhi, Tehsil Indora, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh as a Guru and performs various duties alongwith his chelas and there is a danger to earth and its occupants and only a Guru can sense such threat and provide a complete solution. He submitted that his claim which is true that he is reincarnation of Guru Nanak Dev Ji does not amount to deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious sentiments of any class of people. The complainant is an office bearer of SGPC which is a political body and they are running 'Dharam Ki Industry'. He further submitted that there is only one religion/dharam i.e. Sanatan Dharam and all others in reality are 'Panths' and not religion. He also submitted that rather all

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top