SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 418

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Deepak Gupta, J.
Gurmukh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab & Anr. – Respondents
CRM-M-8386-2023
Decided On : 29-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Nitin Narula, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Randeep Singh Khaira, DAG, Punjab; Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the Respondent No. 2.

The court can quash F.I.R. and subsequent proceedings based on a genuine compromise between the parties, following established legal principles.

Headnote:

Compromise - Quashing of F.I.R. - The court allowed the petition for quashing the F.I.R. and subsequent proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, following the principles laid down in previous judgments.

Fact of the Case:

The petition sought the quashing of F.I.R. and subsequent proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, which was found to be genuine by the learned Magistrate.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the compromise between the parties was voluntary and genuine, and following the principles laid down in previous judgments, allowed the petition for quashing the F.I.R. and subsequent proceedings.

Issues: Quashing of F.I.R. and subsequent proceedings based on compromise

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the principles laid down in previous judgments to allow the quashing of the F.I.R. and subsequent proceedings based on a genuine compromise between the parties.

Final Decision: The petition for quashing the F.I.R. and subsequent proceedings based on a compromise was allowed by the court.

JUDGMENT

Deepak Gupta, J. - Prayer in this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing of F.I.R. No.107 dated 03.09.2014 registered under Sections 427, 447, 511, 506 of the IPC registered at Police Station Bhindi Saida, District Amritsar Rural, and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 04.02.2023 (Annexure P-2).

2. This Court vide order dated 16.02.2023 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before Learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 22.05.2023 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.

4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.

5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant F.I.R.

6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and F.I.R. No. 107 dated 03.09.2014 registered under Sections 427, 447, 511, 506 of the IPC registered at Police Station Bhindi Saida, District Amritsar Rural and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 04.02.2023 (Annexure P-2), are quashed qua the petitioner.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top