AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, HARPREET SINGH BRAR
V. S. Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harpreet Singh Brar, J. - Petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 13.09.2017 (Annexure P-10) passed by respondent No.1 along with order dated 19.10.2011 (Annexure P8) passed by respondent No. 2 and has further sought quashing of the order dated 01.11.2001 (Annexure P-6) passed by respondent No.4 vide which Booth No.71, Sector 16-A, Faridabad allotted to the petitioner was resumed on account of non-payment of the instalments towards the sale consideration within the stipulated period.
2. The brief facts of the case are that Booth No. 71, Sector 16-A, Faridabad was allotted in favour of petitioner on 11.01.1996 through open auction and as per terms and conditions of the allotment letter, 75% price of the site was required to be paid by the allottee in 10 half yearly instalments along with interest at the rate of 15% and the interest was to accrue from the date of offer of possession. The petitioner failed to make payment of instalments as per the terms and conditions of the allotment letter and after giving statutory notices, the site in question was resumed by the Estate Officer, HUDA, Faridabad vide
Dalip Singh and others vs. State of Haryana and others
Hari Shankar and others vs. Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner
Jasbir Singh Bakshi vs. UT Chandigarh
Municipal Corporation Chandigarh vs. Shantikunj Investment (P) Ltd. (2006) 4 SCC 109
Panna Lal and others vs. State of Rajasthan and others
Smitra Jain vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.