SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2103

G. S. SANDHAWALIA, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN
Shanti Lal Sethia – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate; For the Appellant.
Mr. Arun Beniwal, D.A.G., Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Harpreet Kaur Jeewan, J.

CM-12736-CWP-2023

This application has been filed for fixing actual date of hearing in the main case, which is on regular Board at serial No. 399.

In view of the averments made in the application, the same is allowed. Hearing of the main case is pre-poned to today itself.

CWP-7144-2003 (O&M)

The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing communications and orders Annexures P-6, P-15, P-16, P-27, P-29, P-35 and P-36 and seeking a writ in the nature of 'mandamus' directing the Estate Officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority (respondent No. 3) to issue a transfer letter in favour of the petitioner in respect of Plot No. 410, Industrial Area Phase-I, Panchkula (Haryana).

2. The petitioner has challenged the letter, dated 18.12.1995 (Annexure P-6) issued by the Project Manager, District Industries Centre, Panchkula, to the Estate Officer (respondent No. 3), whereby apart from seeking a guarantee, the transfer of the plot was ordered to be allowed subject to the condition that building be completed by 30.06.1996 and further a guarantee was sought and condition was put to start production before 31.12

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top