Tarun Garg vs State of Haryana - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 538

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 538

GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Tarun Garg – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Senior Advocate with Mr. Himmat Singh Deol, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana., for the State; Mr. Mayank Goyal, Advocate for the complainant.;

JUDGMENT

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J. (Oral) -

CRM-8230-2023

In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the documents annexed with the application are taken on record as Annexures P-8 to P-12 subject to all just exceptions.

CRM-M-4117-2023 (Main Case)

1. The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered vide FIR No.01, dated 10.1.2023 at Police Station State Vigilance Bureau, Hisar, under Sections 7, 13(1)(b) of the Prevention of Corruption Act read with Section 13(2) of P.C. Act.

2. The FIR was lodged at the instance of Vikram Singh, wherein it is alleged that he has a contractor license and had undertaken work of installation of water pipe line from Bus Stand Village Matana to main chowk Hanuman Mandir and had spent an amount of Rs.1 lakh on the said work. The complainant alleged that when he met Tarun Garg (petitioner), XEN, Public Health Department, Fatehabad at his residence for release of payment in respect of the said bill, he demanded an amount of Rs.20,000/- and that he (complainant) paid an amount of Rs.9,000/- to the petitioner and the remaining amount of Rs.11,000/- was to be paid on 10.1.2023. The complainant claim