IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sanjay Vashisth, J.
Joga Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
CRA-S-1962-SB-2004
Decided On : 14-02-2023
NDPS - Appeal against conviction under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 15 - Summary: The court examined the reformatory theory and observed that the appellant had reformed himself and rehabilitated in society, and not sending him behind bars may set an example for others. The substantive sentence of imprisonment was reduced to the period already undergone by the appellant, while the fine remained intact.
Fact of the Case:
Joga Singh appealed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence under Section 15 of the NDPS Act for possession of 50 Kgs. of contraband. The appellant had already undergone a substantial period of imprisonment and sought a reduction in the remaining sentence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appellant had reformed himself and rehabilitated in society, and not sending him behind bars may set an example for others. Therefore, the substantive sentence of imprisonment was reduced to the period already undergone by the appellant, while the fine remained intact.
Issues: Appeal against conviction under Section 15 of the NDPS Act, quantum of sentence, reformatory theory, and rehabilitation of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the reformatory theory and considered the appellant's reformation and rehabilitation in society as a basis for reducing the substantive sentence of imprisonment to the period already undergone by him.
Final Decision: The conviction under Section 15 of the NDPS Act was maintained, and the substantive sentence of imprisonment was reduced to the period already undergone by the appellant, while the fine remained intact.
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Vashisth, J. - Appellant - Joga Singh, aged about 45 years (at the time of conviction), has filed the present appeal challenging judgment of conviction dated 07.09.2004, and order of sentence dated 09.09.2004, passed by learned Special Judge, Panipat, in NDPS Case No. 97 of 2003, arising from FIR No. 46, dated 27.01.2001, under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 'NDPS Act'), registered at Police Station City, Panipat.
2. On 27.01.2001, in the area of Bus Stand, Panipat, appellant was found in possession of 50 Kgs. of contraband, which was kept in a jute bag. After completing formalities, investigation and receipt of FSL Report (Ex. P-I), seized contraband was declared that of poppy straw. Accordingly, appellant - Joga Singh was put to trial. He was charged for the offence punishable under Section 15 of the NDPS Act, vide order dated 11.05.2001. Eventually, learned Trial Court held the appellant guilty of the offence, vide judgment of conviction dated 07.09.2004 and vide separate order of sentence dated 09.09.2004, he was sentenced as under:-
Under Section | Sentence | Fine | In Default |
15 of the NDPS Act | 3 years RI | Rs. 10,000/- | 9 months RI |
3. Appeal was admitted on 07.10.2004, and recovery of fine was stayed. Thereafter, vide order dated 07.03.2005, after noticing factum of total undergone period inside jail as 14 months, remaining sentence of the appellant was suspended by this Court.
4. At the final hearing of the appeal today, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has got instructions from his client, not to challenge the judgment of conviction dated 07.09.2004, passed by learned Special Judge, Panipat. However, on the question of quantum of sentence, learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant being first offender & sole bread earner for his family; at present appellant is aged about 66 years; there being no other case ever registered against him, except the present one; already one year, six months and eleven days actual sentence has been undergone by the appellant in jail; and that appellant is facing agony of criminal prosecution for the last about 22 years, therefore, taking a lenient view, remaining substantive sentence of imprisonment of the appellant may be reduced to the period already undergone by him in jail.
5. On the other hand, Mr. Pawan Kumar Jhanda, learned Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, while opposing the submissions addressed by learned counsel for the appellant, submits that prayer of the appellant should not be accepted because he was involved in a serious case, offence of which is a crime against society. Learned State counsel also furnished custody certificate dated 31.01.2023, today in the Court, which is taken on record. As per custody certificate dated 31.01.2023, appellant has undergone one year, six months and eleven days actual sentence from 28.01.2001 to 22.03.2005, out of total substantive sentence of three years, which was ordered by learned Trial Court.
6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and with their able assistance gone through the record.
7. This Court has examined the submissions addressed by learned counsel from both the sides and also perused the custody certificate dated 31.01.2023, and has noticed that except the present case, appellant is not involved in any other criminal case.
8. Another noticeable aspect is that after releasing of the appellant on bail, vide order dated 07.03.2005, by this court, he was never found indulged in any similar activity, which shows that with the passage of time, appellant has adopted the principles of reformatory theory, which otherwise also sends a direct message to reform oneself despite facing conviction in a criminal case.
9. On the issue of reformatory theory in context to any wrong doer, His Lordship V.R. Krishna Iyer, J., of Hon'ble Apex Court, in case titled as Mohammad Giasuddin v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1977) 3 SCC 287, has observed as under:-
'5. Ifevery
AI
The reformatory theory and the rehabilitation of the appellant in society were central to the court's decision in reducing the substantive sentence of imprisonment.
The court considered reformatory theory and lack of criminal antecedents in reducing the substantive sentence of imprisonment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the reformatory theory and the consideration of the appellant's reformation and rehabilitation in society to determine the appro....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering reformation and rehabilitation of the accused, and the need for a balanced approach between punitive attitudes and....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of reformatory theory and rehabilitation principles in sentencing under the NDPS Act, considering the appellant's reformation and l....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.