SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1474

HARKESH MANUJA
Dinesh @ Pala – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Amandeep Rana, Mr. Gaurav Bansal DAG, Haryana

Judgment

Mr. Harkesh Manuja, J.

By way of present appeal, challenge has been made to the judgment of conviction dated 06.08.2016 and order of sentence dated 08.08.2016 passed by the court of learned Judge Special Court, Sonepat, whereby, appellant was convicted under Section 15 (b) of the NDPS Act, 1985 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four year and to pay fine of Rs.30,000/- or in default to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three month.

2. Facts of the case are that the appellant was arrayed as accused in FIR No.245 dated 01.09.2013, under Section 15 (b) of the NDPS Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Murthal, Sonepat, for having possessed 6 Kg Poppy Straw. On the basis of the evidence recorded, learned trial Court convicted and sentenced the appellant as mentioned in para 1 above vide impugned judgment/order.

3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he restricts his prayer only qua reduction of sentence awarded and does not challenge the judgment of conviction on merits. It has been contended that out of four years of his sentence, the appellant has already undergone actual sentence of 05 months a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top