SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 592

KARAMJIT SINGH
Ram Avtar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Vishal Kashyap, DAG, Haryana. Mr. R.S Athwal, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Karamjit Singh, J. - The present petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner/accused seeking quashing of FIR No.749, dated 18.10.2016 registered under Sections 406, 420, 120-B IPC, Police Station Central Faridabad, Annexure P-1, and all the subsequent proceedings arising thereof.

2. On receipt of notice of motion the State counsel appeared on behalf of respondent No.1 while complainant/respondent No.2 also appeared through his counsel.

3. The State filed reply by way of affidavit of Atma Ram, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Central Faridabad. Separate reply was filed on behalf of respondent No.2 contesting the present petition.

4. Rejoinder was filed on behalf of the petitioner to the aforesaid written reply(s).

5. The brief facts of the case are that FIR, Annexure P-1, was registered on the basis of complaint lodged by respondent No.2 Suraj Bhan Chauhan, wherein he has stated that accused No.2 Mahesh approached him with a proposal of good deal with regard to sale of land by the petitioner who is stated to be the owner of total land measuring 67 Kanal 11 Marla. On the basis of said offer petitioner and Mahesh agreed to sell 31 Kanals of land out of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top