SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1835

ANIL KSHETARPAL
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kanta Devi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
V.Ramswaroop, Advocate, Amit Jain, Advocate, Dhruv Mittal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. - These two cross-appeals have come up for disposal. The FAO-6588-2010, has been filed by the Insurance Company, whereas, FAO-39-2011, has been filed by the claimants.

2. The correctness of the findings of the trial with respect to the manner in which the accident took place and the findings of the Tribunal with regard to the rash and negligent driving of driver Darshan Singh are not questioned. The accident took place on 12/8/2008, at about 08:00 p.m., when a road roller which was parked on the road without any indicator or parking lights contributed in the happening of the accident. The Tribunal after appreciating the evidence assessed the amount of compensation to the tune of Rs.27, 70, 000.00. The deceased late Sh. Rishi Pal died on 12/8/2008, while leaving behind aged mother, widow and two minor children.

3. The learned counsel representing the Insurance Company while drawing the attention of the Court to the Insurance Policy Ex.R-1 submits that ONE VIBRATARY ROLLER (SOIL COMPATOR) MODER EC5256 MAKE ESCORT was insured but the liability of the In

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top