SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2157

ALKA SARIN
Gurjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Jagjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Abhishek Singla, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Alka Sarin, J. (Oral) - The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 08.03.2018 (Annexure P-3) whereby the Trial Court has allowed the re-examination of PW1-Gurjit Kaur and PW3-Jagtar Singh on the ground that material questions remained to be put to the said witnesses.

2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioners would contend that the application for recalling PW1 and PW3 for re-examination has been permitted on grounds which are beyond the scope of Order 18 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the defendant-respondent has contended that no prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff-petitioners in case the witnesses are recalled for cross-examination. It is further the contention that when the witnesses were cross-examined earlier, some material questions remained to be put to the witnesses and, hence, it was necessary to recall the witnesses for further cross-examination.

4. Heard.

5. In the present case, the evidence of the witnesses (PW1 and PW3) was recorded and, thereafter, their cross-examination was also conducted. Subsequently, an ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top