SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2116

MANOJ BAJAJ
Paramjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kulwinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Bajaj, J. (Oral) - Petitioner (tenant) is aggrieved against the judgment dated 12.10.2021 passed by the Appellate Authority, Rupnagar in Rent Appeal No.26/2019, whereby the decision dated 04.12.2019 passed by Rent Controller, Rupnagar in Rent Petition No.05 of 29.03.2016, ordering his eviction in a petition filed by landlord (respondent), was upheld.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the respondent (landlord) filed a petition under Section 13 East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for ejectment of tenant-Paramjit Singh by setting up three grounds i.e. arrears of rent, the dilapidated condition of the demised premises as well as personal necessity. As per the pleadings, the demised premises was given on rent to the father of the respondent, namely, Kaka Singh by the father of the petitioner, namely, Pritam Singh.

3. The respondent-tenant in order to contest the ejectment petition, filed his written reply, raising preliminary objections relating to maintainability, mis-joinder of necessary parties etc. and on merits, pleaded that the rent was being paid regularly and in case, there are some arrears, he is ready to pay the same also. According to tenant, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top