H. S. MADAAN
Charanjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Paramdeep Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H.S. Madaan, J. - Briefly stated, facts of the case are that petitioner Paramdeep Singh had brought a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against Avtar Singh - tenant for his eviction from the demised shop forming part of House No.595 opposite Gurudwara Kashmirian, Tripuri Town, Patiala, on the ground of respondent-tenant being in arrears of rent w.e.f. 1.1.2014 to 1.1.2017. That petition was allowed ex-parte by Rent Controller, Patiala. Ms.Charanjit Kaur wife of Avtar Singh tenant had filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC in the rent petition, which was declined. She had filed a revision petition against that order, which was also rejected.
She had filed an application under Section 31 of Punjab Relief Indebtness Act for depositing a sum of Rs.86,400/- as arrears of rent w.e.f. 1.1.2014 to 1.1.2017. Notice of that application was given to petitioner/landlord, who did not accept that amount. Charanjit Kaur had then preferred third party objections before the Executing Court of Rent Controller, Patiala, where the petitioner/landlord had filed an application for execution of the ejectment order t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.