JUDGMENT

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) - In the present petition, the prayer of the petitioner is that the husband of the petitioner was working with the respondent-Federation and after retirement of her husband, no benefit has been extended either to him till he remained alive or after his death to the petitioner in respect of the service, which the late husband of the petitioner performed with the respondent-Federation from 31.07.1980 till 30.04.2012. Further prayer of the petitioner is that the order dated 21.09.2020 (Annexure P-10) be also quashed by which the respondents have imposed a recovery to the tune of Rs.6,44,890/- to be recovered from the retiral benefits admissible in respect of the service rendered by her late husband.

2. As per the averments made in the petition, husband of the petitioner joined the respondent-Federation on 31.07.1980. After performing the duties for a period of approximately 32 years, he retired from the post of Store Keeper on 30.04.2012 on attaining the age of superannuation. After the retirement, no pensionary benefit in respect of the service which the late husband of the petitioner rendered, were extended. It is the specific case of the peti