VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Association of Property Professionals – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J. - Two writ petitions are being disposed of as parties agree that the dispute involved in the present set of petitions is identical and can be decided by a common judgment.
2. The question that arises for consideration in the present petition is as to whether the proprietorship concern is a juristic entity separate and distinct from the proprietor himself and thus liable to pay the charges applicable to the category 'other than individuals' instead of the category of 'individuals' under the RERA Act and the rules framed thereunder.
3.. For the facility of reference, facts have been drawn from CWP-20382-2018 titled 'Kumar Raunak and others versus State of Haryana and another'.
4. Briefly summarized, the facts of the case are that the petitioners are individuals engaged in the business of Real Estate i.e. introducing prospective buyers and sellers to each other for negotiation in relations to sale and purchase of Real Estate property. The petitioners, called as Real Estate Agents, are sole proprietors carrying on their work as individuals under the name
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.