IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
Kanwar Singh Gill Kanwar Singh Gill – Appellant
Versus
Sudha Chaudhari & Ors. – Respondents
CR-5827-2022
Decided On : 09-12-2022
Order XIII Rule 4 - Marking of Documents as Exhibits - The court discussed the local amendment in Order XIII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as applicable to the States of Punjab and Haryana, which allows the court to treat documents as properly admitted in evidence unless non-compliance has resulted in a miscarriage of justice. The court emphasized that if the documents are already part of the record and are per se admissible, the court is required to mark those documents as exhibits without the need for a separate application.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to set aside an interlocutory order passed by the First Appellate Court regarding the marking of documents as exhibits.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the Court to mark the documents as exhibits if they are per se admissible, and disposed of the revision petition while also disposing of any pending miscellaneous applications.
Issues: Interlocutory order, marking of documents as exhibits
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the requirement for marking documents as exhibits if they are already part of the record and per se admissible, as per the local amendment in Order XIII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Final Decision: The revision petition was disposed of, and the court directed the marking of documents as exhibits if they are per se admissible.
JUDGMENT
Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral) - Sh. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the caveator (respondent No1). Sh. Munish Kumar Garg, Advocate states that respondents No.2 to 4 have been proceeded against ex-parte in the trial Court.
2. The prayer is to set aside the interlocutory order passed by the First Appellate Court on 25.11.2022. An application filed by the petitioner for marking the documents which are already a part of the record as exhibits has been dismissed while observing that this Court, while deciding Regular Second Appeal No.5508 of 2014, titled as 'Kanwar Singh Gill Vs. Sudha Chaudhary and others', decided on 04.12.2018, had permitted the parties to lead additional evidence but the plaintiff did not lead any evidence to show the relevancy of the documents.
3. There is a local amendment in Order XIII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as applicable to the States of Punjab and Haryana.
4. The same reads as under:-
'Punjab and Haryana- In order XIII, rule 4 insert the following proviso, namely:-
'Provided that where the Court is satisfied that the documents, not endorsed in the manner laid down in the above rule, was in fact, admitted in evidence, it shall treat the documents as having been properly admitted in evidence unless non-compliance with this rule has resulted in miscarriage of justice."
5. If the documents are already a part of the record and they are per se admissible, the Court is itself required to mark those documents as exhibits. For this purpose, no separate application is required. The Court can mark the documents at any stage particularly when they are already a part of the record.
6. With these observations, the revision petition is disposed of while directing the Court to mark the documents as exhibits, if the same are per se admissible.
7. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.
The court emphasized the requirement to mark documents as exhibits if they are already part of the record and per se admissible, as per the local amendment in Order XIII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil P....
Documents marked in prior interlocutory application can be received at trial without fresh leave under Order VII Rule 14 CPC if relevant.
The procedural non-compliance in document admission does not invalidate evidence or decrees when the substantive findings are unchallenged.
Secondary evidence – In order to produce secondary evidence, foundational evidence for the same has to be led by party who seeks admission of secondary evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.