Back
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Anav Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the petitioner's business licenses. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. details of raw material procurement and licenses. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. details regarding the fir registration and allegations. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. defendant’s arguments against fir validity. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. expert opinions and precedential support. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. arguments concerning statutory compliance and investigation integrity. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. summary of court observations on statutory interpretation. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. final ruling and implications. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
JUDGMENT
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. - Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.177 dated 25.04.2022, registered under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'the NDPS Act') at Police Station Rai, District Sonepat and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
2. In pursuance to the notice of motion order, learned counsel for the State has filed a status report along with certain documents, which are taken on record.
3. Brief facts of the case as set up by the petitioner are that the petitioner is a young
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
