SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1889

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Vishwa Nath Through His Lrs – Appellant
Versus
Onkar Chand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Dhivya Jerath, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Manjari Nehru Kaul J. (Oral) - The petitioners-defendants have filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing of the order dated 09.08.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Mukerian, vide which an application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC by the respondents-plaintiffs, was allowed.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the trial Court while passing the impugned order had exceeded its jurisdiction by going beyond the statutory provisions of Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. She contends that the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC was moved by the respondents at a highly belated stage, i.e., after the commencement of the trial, when the respondents' evidence was underway.

3. Learned counsel further submits that in view of the proviso to Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC, it was imperative upon the respondents to show that they were unable to incorporate the facts sought by way of the amendment in the plaint initially, despite exercise of due diligence. She still further submits that the respondents were in possession of the revenue records, therefore, it could not be digested that they woul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top