SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2042

HARKESH MANUJA
Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Asha Ahuja – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate, for the Appellant

JUDGMENT

Harkesh Manuja, J. (Oral) - By way of present revision petition challenge has been made to an order dated 15.11.2018 (P-3) passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Yamuna Nagar; whereby defence of the petitioner/ defendant (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner') has been struck off.

2. Facts leading to the present case are that the respondent/ plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent') filed a suit for declaration challenging an agreement to sell dated 18.07.2017 to be illegal null and void, besides seeking relief of permanent injunction with a prayer for restraining petitioner from interfering in his possession.

3. Upon notice, petitioner appeared before the trial Court on 12.12.2017 through his counsel Sh.P.K. Punia and sought time for filing of written statement. However, despite having been granted sufficient opportunity, no written statement was filed and resultantly, his defence was ordered to be struck off by the trial Court vide order dated 15.11.2011. Since then the suit is being adjourned for recording of the evidence of respondent, however, a statement of not even a single witness has been recorded so far.

4. Impugning the order dated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top