SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 977

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Manjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Nitish Garg, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vikram Aggarwal, J. (Oral)

1. The instant revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 16.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Court of Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), SBS Nagar, vide which the defence of the petitioners-defendants was struck off on account of nonfiling of written statement.

2. The facts, as emanating from the revision petition, are that a civil suit for permanent and mandatory injunction was filed by the respondent-plaintiff (Mohan Singh) on 25.04.2025. The suit was accompanied by an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. Notice was issued on 28.04.2025. Petitioners put in appearance before the trial Court through their counsel on 29.05.2025 and the case was adjourned to 29.07.2025 for filing of written statement. On the said date, the case was again adjourned to 13.08.2025 and then on 13.08.2025 to 16.09.2025 for filing of the written statement. On 16.09.2025, another suit pending between the same parties was also listed, in which replication was filed by the respondent-plaintiff and the said case was adjourned to 13.10.2025. Since the said case was adjourned to 13.10.2025, the petitioners were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top