SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1992

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
G.S.Sandhawalia, Harpreet Kaur Jeewan, JJ.
Dharampal @ Jagar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CRWP-10773-2022
Decided On : 21-11-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sahil Chaudhary, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Addl. A.G., Haryana., for the Respondent

The paramount importance of the father's presence in family rituals and events, as well as compliance with custody certificates, can be considered in granting custody parole under The Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022.

Headnote:

Parole - The Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022 - The court granted custody parole to the petitioner for attending his daughter's marriage, considering the paramount importance of the father's presence in the family rituals and the petitioner's compliance with the custody certificate.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought parole for attending his daughter's marriage due to his conviction. The court granted custody parole for the specified period and required the petitioner to bear the costs of armed police custody.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the presence of the father at his daughter's marriage was crucial and granted custody parole accordingly. The court also directed the petitioner to bear the costs of armed police custody due to the parole being outside the jurisdiction of Haryana.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted custody parole for attending his daughter's marriage despite his conviction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the provisions of Section 6 of The Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022, which allows for custody parole for attending family events, and the petitioner's compliance with the custody certificate.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the court granted custody parole to the petitioner for attending his daughter's marriage, with the petitioner being required to bear the costs of armed police custody for the specified period.

JUDGMENT

G.S.Sandhawalia, J. (Oral) - The present petition has been filed for grant of 3 weeks' parole to the petitioner under Section 3(1)(2) of The Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022 on account of the marriage of his daughter, which is stated to be fixed for 24th to 28th November, 2022 (in short 'the Act').

2. It has been averred that the petitioner has been convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad on 16.03.2022 in FIR No. 126 dated 01.06.2018 for the offences under Sections 148, 149, 285, 364, 302, 201, 452 IPC and Sections 25, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act.

3. The appeal is stated to be pending before this Court. Averments have been made that the marriage of the daughter has been fixed with one Yogesh for 24.11.2022 to 28.11.2022 and in such circumstances, the presence of the father is required.

4. In the reply filed by the Deputy Superintendent, Central Jail-2, Hisar, it has been averred that the SHO, P.S. Khajuwala, Bikaner has verified the fact that the marriage is taking place in village 4 KYD and there is a positive report as such. However, on account of a legal bar that he has not completed his one year sentence after conviction as provided under Section 3(3) of the Act, rejection order has been passed by the Superintendent, Central Jail, Hisar on 19.11.2022 (Annexure R-4). The impugned order, however, shows that the benefit of 'custody parole' as per Section 6(4)(5)(6) of the Act has been granted, provided an adult member of the family applies.

5. However, in the present case, facts and circumstances are peculiar in as much admittedly the petitioner belongs to Bikaner, Rajasthan and, therefore, as per Section 6(6), the 'custody parole' is to be granted only for 6 hours for one event which would also include the marriage of the children. Section 6 of the Act reads thus:-

    '6. (1) The competent authority shall grant custody parole to a convicted prisoner subject to such conditions and procedure as specified under sections 11 and 12.

    (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sections 3, 4 and 5, no hardcore convicted prisoner shall be entitled to be released on emergency parole or regular parole or furlough:

    Provided that a hardcore convicted prisoner may be granted custody parole for attending funeral of his family members or marriage of his children or siblings.

    (3) Notwithstanding anything contained in subsection (1), a hardcore convicted prisoner, who has not been awarded death penalty or life imprisonment till natural life and has completed five years of his sentence (including maximum two years under trial period), without committing any major jail offence or any cognizable offence during the last five years, shall be entitled for emergency parole or regular parole or furlough at par with convicted prisoners. Such period of five years shall be counted from the date of his latest offence or act which falls under the category of hardcore convicted prisoner:

    Provided that a hardcore convicted prisoner who has been sentenced for imprisonment till natural life shallbe eligible for emergency parole orregular parole at par with convicted prisoners only after completion of seven years of imprisonment after conviction:

    Provided further that if the hardcore convicted prisoner so released temporarily violates any condition of parole or furlough or commits any cognizable offence, he shall be debarred from such release for next three years.

    (4) Convicted prisoner including hardcore convicted prisoner may be granted custody parole without taking into account his period of completion of sentence for attending funeral of his family member or marriage of his children or siblings.

    (5) The competent authority shall verify the facts for granting custody parole through in-charge of the police station where the prisoner wants to avail the custody parole or through a jail officer not below the rank of Assistant Superintendent Jail.

    (6) Custody parole shall not be granted for more than six hours for one event excludi

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top