PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
AMARJOT BHATTI, J.
Kuldeep Alias Balkar - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Haryana And Others - Respondent
CRWP-11093-2024
Decided On : 03-12-2024
JUDGMENT :
Amarjot Bhatti, J.
Petitioner Kuldeep alias Balkar filed criminal writ petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India read with Section 3 and 5 of Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act, 2022') for issuing writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing speaking order dated 03.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) vide which Superintendent of Jail, District Jail, Kamal - respondent No. 4 declined grant of emergency parole to petitioner for the purpose of marriage of his daughter, for a duration of 10 weeks on the ground that petitioner fell under the category of 'hardcore prisoner' under Section 2(1)(g)(vi) of the Act, 2022, without considering the law and relevant provisions with further prayer that he may be released on emergency parole for a period of 10 weeks for marriage of his daughter Khushi, fixed from 04.12.2024 to 05.12.2024 or any other appropriate direction which the Court may deem fit and proper in the given facts and circumstances of case.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner argued that petitioner was convicted in FIR No. 115 dated 11.04.2010, under Section 148, 302, 307, 324, 323, 395 and 447 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Ganaur, District Sonipat, to undergo imprisonment for life. He had preferred appeal in High Court bearing CRA-D-394-DB-2013, titled 'Kuldeep alias Balkar and others Vs. State of Haryana', which is dismissed on 11.01.2017. Petitioner is undergoing sentence in District Jail, Karnal. Marriage of petitioner's daughter Khushi is fixed from 04.12.2024 to 05.12.2024 and in order to fulfill his family obligations, he had applied for emergency parole. Competent authority wrongly held him under the category of 'hardcore prisoner' under Section 2(1)(g)(vi) of the Act, 2022 and it was held that he was not found eligible for temporary release on parole under Section 6(3) of the Act, 2022, having not completed 5 years of sentence, thus, rejected his application vide impugned order dated 03.11.2024 (Annexure P-1). Case of present petitioner is fully covered under the provisions of Section 5 of the Act, 2022. Action of respondent No. 4 is illegal, unsustainable in the eyes of law and arbitrary, thus, liable to be set aside. Family members of petitioner have already submitted their undertaking and there is a report of Gram Panchayat, village Nayabans, Tehsil Ganaur, District Sonipat. He is ready to fulfill all conditions and will maintain good conduct throughout the period of sentence and while on bail.
Hence, present petition.
3. Status report is already filed. It is argued that present petitioner/convict was convicted on 30.03.2013 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonipat in FIR No. 115/2010 dated 11.04.2010 under Section 148, 302, 307, 323, 324, 447 of IPC read with Section 149 of IPC for rigorous imprisonment for Life and fine of ?10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months. Apart from aforesaid case, he was involved in nine other cases detailed in para No. 3 of status report and in three of the cases, he is on bail facing trial, whereas, in other six cases, he was acquitted on different dates. It is pointed out that petitioner was released on special parole on 04.03.2020 from Central Jail, Ambala during pandemic Covid-19 but he did not follow parole rules and was involved in FIR No. 213 dated 17.07.2020 under Section 341, 364-A, 34 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, Police Station Rai, District Sonipat and other FIR No. 304/2020 under Section 25 of Arms Act, Police Station Ganaur, District Sonipat. He was arrested by local police before expiry of his parole and was sent to District Jail, Sonipat on 19.07.2020. Again petitioner was released on parole for six weeks on 16.07.2021 for agricultural work and he was again involved in FIR No. 373 dated 10.08.2021, under Section 392, 482, 120-B of IPC, Police Station Dankaur, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pra
A hardcore prisoner is ineligible for emergency parole unless he completes five years of imprisonment after the latest offence; however, the court may permit temporary release for last rites under es....
House repair constitutes 'sufficient cause' for parole under the Good Conduct Act, and specific conditions can be imposed to ensure the safety and security of the victim and her family members during....
The Act provides specific criteria for the temporary release of 'hardcore prisoners,' and violations of conditions of temporary release can lead to permanent debarment from future release.
The restriction of one year imprisonment after conviction to be eligible for temporary release on parole cannot supersede the substantive provisions of the Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.