SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2030

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority (Puda) – Appellant
Versus
Jasneet Kaur Chahal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms.Anu Chatrath, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Chanderdeep Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.1 in RERA-Appl-31-2020 and for Respondent No.1 in RERA-Appl-37-2020 Mr. Amarjit Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.1 in RERA-Appl-32-2020 Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for Respondent No.1 in RERA-Appl-33-2020 Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Advocate for Respondents in RERA-Appl-34-2020 and in RERA-Appl-40-2020 Mr. Kesar Singh, Respondent No.1 in Person in RERA-Appl-35-2020 Mr. Bhupinder Singh Walia, Advocate for Respondent No.1 in RERA-Appl-36-2020 Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.1 in RERA-Appl-38-2020 Mr. Animesh Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.2 in All Appeals

JUDGMENT

Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral) - By this order, 9 RERA appeals i.e RERA-Appeal No.32,31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 40 of 2020 shall stand disposed of.

2. While refusing to condone the delay of 64 days in filing the first appeals, the Appellate Tribunal has dismissed as many as 9 appeals. The Real Estate Regulatory Authority passed the impugned order on 22nd October, 2019. The Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority, on receipt of the copies of various orders, filed respective appeals alongwith applications for condonation of delay. The delay was sought to be explained in the following manner:-

    '2.That in the present case, the Ld. Authority had passed the impugned order on 22.10.2019. Copy of the order was dispatched on 06.11.2019 and had been received in the office of the appellant on 18.11.2019 which was diarized vide No. 26744 dated 18.11.2019 and was marked to Legal Advisor (LA) on the same very date. The LA marked it to SLO with the remarks, 'Pl. examine and put up on file and the SLO marked the file to LO-1.

    3. That L0-1 after collecting the relevant documents from the office of the Appellant and also from the counsel of the appellant who conducted the case before th

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top