SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2044

HARKESH MANUJA
Neeraj – Appellant
Versus
Narender Chaudhary – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Amit Singla, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Ajit Singh Lamba, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Harkesh Manuja J. (Oral) - By way of present revision petition, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 19.07.2022, whereby his right to file written statement has been closed.

2. The facts leading to the present revision petition are that an ejectment petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 (as amended upto date) was filed at the instance of respondent No.1 against the petitioner as well as respondent No.2 regarding the tenanted premises being part of property bearing MCH No.B-IV-2, New property ID No.31C230U1 situated at Tilak Bazar, Inside Talaki Gate, Hisar. The aforesaid eviction petition was filed on 08.04.2021 on the ground of bonafide necessity of respondent No.1-landlord as well as his major son and daughter, besides the premises in question having become unfit and unsafe for human habitation. The petitioner appeared before the learned Rent Controller on 18.05.2022 through his Advocate, in pursuance to the service effected upon him and made a request for grant of opportunity to file written statement and the matter was adjourned to 05.07.2022. On 05.07.2022, there was change of counsel from the side of the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top