IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Lisa Gill, Harsh Bunger, JJ.
Sahab Khan & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CWP-2637 of 2018
Decided On : 30-09-2022
Land Utilization Plan - Gram Panchayat - Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Rules, 1964 - The court held that the Gram Panchayat is entitled to change the user of land under Rule 3 of the Rules, 1964 and change of user of shamlat deh land for plantation purposes being duly covered under Rule 3(2)(ii) of the Rules, 1964. The court permitted the user of land by PWD (B&R) department for 'plantation purposes' and directed the Block Development and Panchayat Officer (BDPO) to ensure that the land utilization plan in respect of land in Village Terakpur be prepared within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quashing of the approval for the sale of Gram Panchayat's land for plantation purposes. The petitioners argued that the Gram Panchayat had no authority to change the nature of Charand land to any other use without preparing a land utilization plan.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Gram Panchayat is entitled to change the user of land under Rule 3 of the Rules, 1964 and permitted the user of land by PWD (B&R) department for 'plantation purposes'. The court directed the Block Development and Panchayat Officer (BDPO) to ensure the preparation of the land utilization plan.
Issues: The main issue was whether the Gram Panchayat had the authority to change the nature of Charand land to any other use without preparing a land utilization plan.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Gram Panchayat is entitled to change the user of land under Rule 3 of the Rules, 1964 and permitted the user of land by PWD (B&R) department for 'plantation purposes'. The court also directed the preparation of the land utilization plan.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed off with the court permitting the user of land by PWD (B&R) department for 'plantation purposes' and directing the preparation of the land utilization plan.
JUDGMENT
Harsh Bunger, J. - The petitioners, who are residents of Village Terakpur, Gram Panchayat Dhandhuka, Tehsil and District Nuh, have filed this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari seeking quashing of order dated 30.08.2017 (Annexure P-3), whereby, the Government of Haryana through Principal Secretary to Government, Haryana Development and Panchayats Department has accorded approval to the sale of Gram Panchayat's land measuring 180 kanal bearing Khasra Nos.18//4 (8-0), 5(8-0), 6(8-0), 7(8-0), 13(8-0), 14(8-0), 15(8-0), 16(8-0), 17(8-0), 18(8-0), 19(8-0), 22(8-0), 23(8-0), 24(8-0), 25(8-0), 21//1/1 (3-16), 2/2 (7-7), 3(8-0), 4(8-0), 5(8-0), 6 (6-8), 7/2 (5-2), 8(4-8), 9/1 (1-15), 22//5 (7-4) as resolved by the Gram Panchayat Dhandhuka, Block and District Nuh vide its resolution No.1 dated 24.06.2017. It requires mention that there is a common Gram Panchayat for two villages namely, Terakpur and Dhandhuka. The petitioners have also sought setting aside of resolution No.1 dated 24.06.2017 (Annexure P-2), on the ground that the Gram Panchayat has no right/authority to change the nature of Charand land to any other use. A further direction has also been sought for directing the respondents, not to change the nature of the land, in dispute.
2. It is the submission of the petitioners that resolution No.1 dated 24.06.2017 (Annexure P-2) has been wrongly passed by the Gram Panchayat, whereby it has been resolved to sell the land on collector/market rate to the PWD (B&R) department for plantation, as the Gram Panchayat is not competent to divert the usage of the land; which according to the petitioners is ' Charand' land. It is also the submission of the petitioners that the Gram Panchayat is precluded from dealing with Shamlat land or land vested in the Gram Panchayat, without preparing a land utilization plan as provided under Rule 3 read with Rule 8 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964 (here-in-after referred to as 'the Rules, 1964').
3. Upon issuance of notice, the respondents have appeared and filed their respective written statements.
4. Deputy Commissioner, Nuh has filed written statement on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2, wherein, stand taken is that Gram Panchayat has every right to use, manage and dispose of its land/property in accordance with the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as 'the Act, 1961) and the Rules, 1964 framed thereunder besides provisions of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 and Haryana Panchayati Raj Rules, 1995. It has been further stated that in Village Terakpur, the Gram Panchayat is owner in possession of land measuring 501 kanal-15 marlas and resolution No.1 dated 24.06.2017 has been passed by the said Gram Panchayat to sell its land to PWD (B&R) department for plantation. The said resolution was forwarded to the State Government through Deputy Commissioner, for its approval. Government of Haryana, after considering resolution No.1 passed by the Gram Panchayat as well as recommendation of Deputy Commissioner, gave its approval vide order dated 03.08.2017 (Annexure P-3) to the Gram Panchayat for sale of land measuring 180 kanal of Village Terakpur to PWD (B&R) Department, for plantation. The Collector rate of the said land was fixed at Rs.28 lacs per acre under Rule 12(1) of the Rules, 1964. It is further stated that after taking due approval from the State Government, Gram Panchayat Dhandhuka has executed two sale deeds vide Vasika no.3023 dated 18.10.2017 and Vasika no.3593 dated 04.12.2017 for total land measuring 180 kanals of Village Terakpur. It has also been stated that the Gram Panchayat has already reserved about 40 kanals of land for charand vide its resolution dated 22.05.2017 and considering the population of the village along with number of animals including goats etc. in the village, the Gram Panchayat has sufficient land for pasturing t
The court established the legality of the sale of shamlat land by the Gram Panchayat to the CISF based on the provisions of the Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 and the Punjab Vill....
A public interest litigation challenging the disposal of Gram Panchayat land cannot be entertained when the transaction was approved by competent authorities for public benefit, the petitioner failed....
The classification of lands as shamlat patti is upheld; civil courts lack jurisdiction over ownership disputes regarding shamlat deh lands under the Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.