SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 615

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J.
Ranjeet Singh and others - Petitioners - Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab and others - Respondents - Respondent
CWP-15069 of 2023
Decided On : 18-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. J.S. Brar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Headnote:

Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Representation - Appointment of authorised Panch

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking directions to decide their representations for the appointment of an authorised Panch under Section 22 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition with a direction to the District Development & Panchayat Officer to expeditiously decide the representation in accordance with the law.

Issues: Appointment of authorised Panch under Section 22 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for expeditious decision-making on the representation in accordance with the law.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with a direction to decide the representation expeditiously.

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.

1. Instant civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to decide the representations, dated 21.03.2023 and 19.05.2023, Annexures P-3 and P-5, respectively.

2. It has been contended by counsel for the petitioners that sitting Sarpanch has been suspended and out of 11 Panches, 8 Panches, i.e. petitioners No.2 to 8 are with petitioner No.1. He submits that in the facts and circumstances, petitioner No.1 be appointed as the authorised Panch in view of Section 22 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. He further submits that for redressal of their grievances, the petitioners have filed representations, dated 21.03.2023 and 19.05.2023, Annexures P-3 and P-5, but no decision has been taken on the same.

3. Notice of motion.

4. On asking of the Court, Ms.Akshita Chauhan, DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State.

5. After hearing counsel for the parties and going through the file, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2, i.e. District Development & Panchayat Officer, Civil Secretariat, Sri Muktsar Sahib, District Sri Muktsar Sahib to look into the representation, dated 21.03.2023, Annexure P-3, and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law preferably within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Order accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top