SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 681

ARUN MONGA
Rishita – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Petitioners in person.
Mr. Manjot Singh Gujral, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Additional A.G., Haryana.

ARUN MONGA, J.

Conflict herein is the enforcement of fundamental rights of the petitioners to seek protection of their “life and liberty” as enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India vis-à-vis a conceded violation of Section 5 (iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, inasmuch as a boy aged 20 years 09 months and girl 18 years have got married with each other, claiming to be in love.

2. Notice of motion to the official respondents, at this stage only, is being issued. Learned State counsel on service of advance copy of the petition appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State of Haryana.

3. Given the nature of the order being passed, there is no necessity to seek any return by the official respondents or even to serve the private respondents No.4 to 6.

4. Facts, as pleaded in the petition, succinctly are that family members of petitioner No.1 were against her wish to marry petitioner No.2. However, petitioners got married on 21.07.2023 according to Hindu Rites. Photographs of their marriage have been appended with the petition. Petitioners state that after their marriage, private respondents have issued threat to eliminate them in order to save their family p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top