Mamta vs State of U. T. , Chandigarh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 718

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Mamta – Appellant
Versus
State of U. T. , Chandigarh – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Ms, Ekta Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Malhotra, Advocate for Ms. Simsi Dhir Malhotra, APP, U.T., Chandigarh.
Mr. Rakshak Gupta, Advocate, for the complainant.

JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.06, dated 15.01.2022, under Sections 384 & 420 IPC registered at Police Station I.T. Park, U.T., Chandigarh.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a lady of the age of 32 years and there was a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the complainant since the petitioner is the wife of the complainant. She further submitted that as per the allegations, the complainant who is the husband of the petitioner had alleged that they were earlier in a live-in-relationship and thereafter, the complainant was admitted in a hospital due to some disease but in the meantime when he was discharged he was told by the petitioner that she was pregnant but she had aborted the baby and that she would show the entire documents etc. to the world at large and for that purpose she had extorted the money from the complainant to the tune of Rs.20,000/-. She submitted that thereafter the complainant and the petitioner got married with each other. She further submitted that even a petition for divorce under the pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document