ARCHANA PURI, J.

1. These are two revision petitions filed by the petitioners-contesting defendants to assail the order dated 31.10.2019 (Annexure P-5) passed by learned Court below, whereby, an application for seeking amendment of the plaint was allowed.

2. CR-560-2020 has been filed petitioner-Tej Paul Oswal, who was defendant No.5, before learned Court below and CR-944-2020 has been filed by petitioner-Bharatth Oswal, who was defendant No.11 before learned Court below.

3. The facts, as culled out, from the paperbook are that, initially, in the year 2009, contesting respondents-plaintiffs had filed a suit for mandatory injunction, thereby, seeking issuance of direction to the defendants to make necessary correction in the revenue record, by entering mutations of the land, as detailed in the head-note of the plaint, known as Oswal House, in favour of successors-in-interest of late Lachhman Dass and subsequent vendees-plaintiffs, who purchased the land vide sale deeds, as detailed in the plaint.

4. The contesting respondents-plaintiffs asserted themselves to be owner-in-possession of the suit property, which had been purchased by them from the predecessor, as mentioned in the plaint.

5.