SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 772

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Sunil Kumar Lodhi – Appellant
Versus
Snehlata Rao – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sankalp Kochar for petitioner; D.K. Dixit for respondent No. 3.

ORDER

1. Since pleadings are complete and learned counsel for the parties are ready to argument the matter, therefore, it is heard finally.

2. By the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners/plaintiffs are challenging the legality, validity and propriety of order dated 15.9.2022 (Annexure-P/4) passed by the Court of 08th Civil Judge Junior Division, Jabalpur in RCSA No.6335/2020 whereby the trial Court has rejected their application filed under Order 6 rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

3. As per facts of the case, the petitioners/plaintiffs had filed a suit for declaration of ownership of land bearing Khasra No.1/1 measuring 0.345 hectares and recovery of possession along with a mandatory injunction to remove the construction raised and permanent injunction to restrain alienation/creation of encumbrance on the property in dispute. However, according to the petitioners a property admeasuring 1.356 hectares belonged to Ghinau @ Ghisru Lodhi and Ramdas Lodhi. On partition between the two in the 1978, the property in dispute came to be vested with Ghinau @ Ghisru Lodhi (dead -01.08.1985). Ghinau @ Ghisru Lodhi had a wife named Renaka Bai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top