SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 832

SANJAY VASHISTH
Neeta – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Bhisham Kumar Majoka, Advocate for the appellant(s).
Mr. Sachin Ohri, Advocate for respondent No.3 – Insurance Co.

SANJAY VASHISTH, J.

CM-7367-CII-2023

i. Prayer in this civil miscellaneous application is for condoning the delay of 21 days in filing the present appeal.

ii. Notice of this application was issued.

iii. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and in view of the grounds mentioned in the application, the delay of 21 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.

Civil Misc. application stands disposed of.

FAO-1927-2023 (O&M)

1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants/claimants (hereinafter referred as ‘claimants’) in MACT Case No. 70 registered on 26.05.2021, for modification of award dated 16.11.2022, passed by Ld. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Palwal (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld. Tribunal’) by way of seeking enhancement of amount of compensation, on account of death of ‘Manoj @ Anmol’ in a motor vehicular accident.

2. Claimants in the MACT case were Smt. Neeta (mother of deceased), Kumar Pal (father of deceased) and Mohit Sharma (brother of deceased). In the present appeal before this Court, mother and father of the deceased, are appellants No.1 & 2, respectively, while

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top