JUDGMENT :

Subhash Chand, J.

1. We are taking up this defective appeal for final disposal and directing the office to give regular number, as we have condoned the delay today.

2. Heard Sri Anubhav Sinha, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri Brijesh Chandra Naik, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 (Insurance Company). None appears for owner and driver.

3. This appeal, at the behest of the claimants, challenges the judgment and award dated 30.03.2017 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge II, Gautam Budh Nagar (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal') in M.A.C.P. Case No.24 of 2014 awarding a sum of Rs.9,31,625/- as compensation.

4. This appeal is of the year 2018 and both the counsels have agreed with our suggestion for getting the matter finally disposed of without record so that the liability to pay interest is lessened as the only issue to be decided is quantum assessed.

5. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the deceased was 26 years of age at the time of accident. He was in job, but he was not a permanent employee, therefore, the Tribunal did not grant any amount under the head of future loss of income, as the job was