SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 845

KARAMJIT SINGH
Paramjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Sant Ram – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Veenet Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. D.V. Dhindsa, Advocate for the respondent.

KARAMJIT SINGH, J.

1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 22.1.2020 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Ambala, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC seeking permission to file appeal as an indigent person was dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that respondents No.1 and 2 filed suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell dated 3rd January, 2014 against the petitioner and the said suit was contested by the petitioner but finally the same was decreed in favour of the respondents No.1 and 2 and against the petitioner vide judgment dated 20.4.2019. Being aggrieved the petitioner filed an appeal in the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Ambala. Along with the appeal an application was filed by the petitioner under Order 33 CPC seeking permission to file the said appeal as a pauper. The said application was dismissed by the 1st Appellate Court of Additional District Judge vide impugned order (Annexure P-4) on the basis of report of Collector, wherein it was recorded that the petitioner is having 02-06 Bigahas land in State of Himachal Pradesh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top