JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.

The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 02.01.2019 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad, whereby the respondent/accused has been discharged.

2. The brief facts of the case are that a complaint was filed by the appellant/complainant against the respondent/accused Gayatri Devi for having committed offences punishable under Sections 209 and 193 IPC. The allegations were that Gayatri had filed several cases and complaints against the appellant/complainant but all of them were false.

3. Based on the preliminary evidence led, the respondent/accused was summoned under Section 209 IPC. On her appearance, documents were supplied to her under Section 208 Cr.P.C. In pre-charge evidence, the appellant/complainant examined himself, after which, the pre-charge evidence stood closed.

4. Thereafter, the respondent-accused came to be discharged from all the charges levelled against her vide judgment dated 02.01.2019. The said judgment has been impugned in the present appeal.

5. Initially, the appellant/complainant was appearing in person. Thereafter, one Ms. Sunita Ojha, Advocate, was appointed as Amicus Curiae. Since she did not appear, s