ALKA SARIN
Phool Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Satnarain – Respondent
ALKA SARIN, J.
1. The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the plaintiff-petitioner challenging the order dated 10.08.2018 whereby an application filed by defendant-respondent No.1 on behalf of defendant-respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5 for leading secondary evidence qua Will dated 18.07.1988 (Ex.P/13) has been allowed.
2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiff-petitioner and the proforma-defendant/respondent Nos.3 to 5 are joint owners in possession to the extent of 1/12th share each and that defendant-respondent Nos.1 and 2 to the extent of 1/3rd share each in respect of land measuring 171 Kanal 07 Marlas as fully described in the plaint as well as for declaration that Will dated 18.07.1988 (Ex.P/13) and the revenue entries and the mutation (Ex.P/2) made on the basis of the Will are illegal, null and void and not binding on the rights of the plaintiff-petitioner. A written statement was filed on behalf of defendant-respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5 wherein it has been stated that Badlu had executed a Will dated 18.07.1988 (Ex.P/13) in fav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.