SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1241

H. S. MADAAN
Kamlesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rajnish K. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

H. S. MADAAN, J.

1. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that, plaintiff – Kamlesh wife of Ramesh Chand had filed a suit against defendants State of Haryana and others, contending that she is owner in possession of land measuring 77 Kanal 16 Marla being 151/14352 share of total land measuring 7396 Kanal 19 Marla, situated at village Padha, Tehsil Ballah, District Karnal, having purchased the same from earlier owners Smt. Yashvanti w/o Krishan Kumar and Smt. Saroj w/o Satbir and she was delivered exclusive possession of the land measuring 72 Kanal 7 Marla by her vendors out of total land of 77 Kanal 16 Marla purchased by her and possession of rest of the land was delivered in the form of share. As a matter of fact vendors of the plaintiff had purchased the land from Kanwar Bhan @ Kanwal Pal, Suresh Kumar and Dharampal son of Hari Ram, vide registered sale deed No. 94/1 dated 9.5.2006 and mutation was entered and sanctioned in their favour. Kanwar Bhan @ Kanwar Pal, Suresh Kumar and Dharampal were in exclusive possession of land measuring 74 Kanal 7 Marla and in rest of the land they were cosharers and they had delivered the possession of the land to the plaintiff as per their posses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top