SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2961

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
B.S.WALIA
Harish Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Navdeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr.B.S.Bali, Advocate for the petitioners.

JUDGMENT

B.S.Walia, J. (Oral)

1. Petitioners have challenged judgment dated 04.09.2017 Annexure P-3 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, whereby order dated 25.05.2017 Annexure P-2 passed by the learned Addl. Civil Judge(Sr. Div) Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, dismissing the application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, CPC was set aside.

2. Brief facts of the case leading to the filing of the instant revision petition are that the respondent-plaintiff filed a civil suit on 27.03.2017 on the ground that he was one of the co-sharers and sought permanent injunction for restraining the petitioners-defendants from taking actual, physical and exclusive possession of a specific portion of the land. Respondent-plaintiff also filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, CPC, which was declined by the learned Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) SBS Nagar, vide order dated 25.05.2017. Aggrieved, the respondent-plaintiff filed an appeal which as has been noticed above was allowed by the learned Additional District Judge, SBS Nagar, vide order dated 04.09.2017 i.e. Annexure P-3, by taking note of the fact that the defendant/petitioner No.1 Harish Kaur purchased t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top