IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, SUDEEPTI SHARMA, JJ.
Bandna Goindi – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
CWP No. 27916 of 2023
Decided On : 02-02-2024
AGE OF SUPERANNUATION - TEACHER - UGC Regulations, Punjab University Calendar Regulations - The court discussed the applicability of UGC Regulations and Punjab University Calendar Regulations in determining the age of superannuation for a teacher in a privately managed college. The judgment highlighted the reasonable classification between employees of government colleges and government-aided private colleges, and the implications of grants-in-aid from the Government of India. The court dismissed the writ petition and directed an independent audit of financial resources of government-aided private colleges.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a teacher in a privately managed college, sought a writ of mandamus to raise her age of superannuation to 65 years, citing UGC Regulations and the adoption of Central Rules by Punjab University. The respondent, U.T. Administration, opposed the relief, stating that the notification on age of superannuation applied only to government employees.
Finding of the Court:
The court rejected the petitioner's claim, emphasizing the applicability of Punjab University Calendar Regulations to determine the age of superannuation for teachers in privately managed colleges. It upheld the reasonable classification between government and government-aided private colleges and dismissed the writ petition.
Issues: The issues revolved around the applicability of UGC Regulations, Punjab University Calendar Regulations, and the notification on age of superannuation to teachers in privately managed colleges, and the classification between government and government-aided private colleges.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the notification on age of superannuation applied only to government employees and did not extend to teachers in privately managed colleges. It emphasized the reasonable classification between government and government-aided private colleges based on financial liabilities and grants-in-aid.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition and directed an independent audit of financial resources of government-aided private colleges, with the matter listed for further hearing.
JUDGMENT :
SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.
Factual Background
1. The petitioner herein is working as a teacher (Associate Professor) in a Govt. aided privately managed college namely Sri Guru Gobind Singh College, Sector-26, Chandigarh affiliated to Punjab University, Chandigarh. The petitioner is seeking the making of a writ of mandamus, thus directing the respondents concerned, to raise her age of superannuation till 65 years, hence in terms of UGC Regulations, which have already been adopted and implemented by the Punjab University, Chandigarh.
2. The petitioner is averred to attain the age of 60 years on 10.12.2023. She is aggrieved against her proposed retirement at the age of 60 years, despite the fact that all the teaching staff, thus working in the Government Colleges of U.T., Chandigarh, are permitted to serve till the age of 65 years, given the superannuation age standing enhanced to 65 years, owing to the adoption/applicability vide notification dated 29.03.2022 (Annexure P-39) of the Central Pattern of Rules in U.T. Chandigarh.
3. Furthermore, a prayer is also made for the quashing and setting aside of the communication dated 15.02.2023 (Annexure P-50), whereby clarification has been given by the Secretary Education, Chandigarh Administration, to the Principals of privately managed Govt. Aided Colleges in U.T. Chandigarh, that insofar as the adoption/applicability vide notification dated 29.03.2022 (Annexure P-39) of the Central Pattern of Rules in U.T. Chandigarh, rather is concerned, thus the same relating only to the Govt. Colleges and the Technical University under the administrative control of the Administrator of Union Territory of Chandigarh, and, has nothing to do with the private aided colleges/institutions.
Submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made a claim for grant of the writ reliefs inter-alia on the following submissions:
(ii) During the years 1991 to March 2022, the service conditions including superannuation age etc of the members of teaching faculty of privately managed aided colleges, were governed by the relevant rules of Govt. of Punjab, which had been specifically notified and adopted by the Govt. of India, and, also had been made applicable vide notification dated 15.01.1992 (Annexure P-13) qua the employees of Chandigarh Administration, and, later had been extended qua the employees of the privately managed aided colleges of Chandigarh. As such, the members of teaching faculty in privately aid colleges would retire at the age of 60 years, because correspondingly under the Punjab Civil Service Rules, the age of retirement had been fixed at 60 years.
(iii) However, vide notification dated 29.03.2022 (Annexure P-39), whereby the Punjab Rules of 1992 became abrogated and the Central Rules came into force, vis-a-vis, the service conditions (including age of retirement) of the employees of Chandigarh Administration. Consequently, it is submitted that from 01.04.2022, the age of superannuation of the teaching faculty of Government colleges, in Chandigarh Administration, thus is governed by the Central Service Rules. As such, the Teachers in the Govt. Colleges in Chandigarh Administration would now be superannuating at the age of 65 years.
(iv) Therefore, it is argued that with the said notification i.e. Annexure P-39, being restricted only to the service conditions of the members of the teaching faculty of Government Colleges in the Chandigarh Administration, besides when the apposite Punjab Rules were abrogated vide notification dated 29.03.2022, thereby there are no rules governing the service conditions of the teachers of the Government aided privately managed colleges i
The main legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of Punjab University Calendar Regulations in determining the age of superannuation for teachers in privately managed colleges, an....
The distinction between Government and privately managed schools is a reasonable and valid classification, and the Punjab Act and Central Service Rules govern the service conditions of teaching facul....
UGC Regulations prescribing superannuation at 62 years for college teachers not binding on State Government employees unless expressly adopted by State via service rule amendments.
The UGC Regulations apply to universities and colleges receiving substantial financial assistance from the State Governments and cannot be enforced on private unaided institutions. The age of superan....
The court established that teaching staff have a right to enforce the statutory age of superannuation of 65 years, as per the University Grants Commission regulations.
University Grants Commission Regulations on superannuation are recommendatory and not binding on state universities, allowing discretion in their implementation.
Regulations framed under Clause (g) of Section 26, which dealt with regulation and maintenance of standards and regulation of facilities in Universities.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.