IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
V. Kameswar Rao, J.
Dr. Meera Sood - Appellant
Versus
University Of Delhi & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 5652 of 2019, Civil Miscellaneous No. 24792 of 2019, 4509, 27731, 27732 of 2021
Decided On : 10-11-2021
AGE OF SUPERANNUATION - DPE - UNIVERSITY OF DELHI - WRIT PETITION - DELHI UNIVERSITY ACT, 1922 - UGC REGULATIONS - UNIVERSITY STATUTES AND ORDINANCES - RETIREMENT AGE - DPE EQUATED WITH TEACHERS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES - NO PARITY WITH TEACHERS - AGE OF SUPERANNUATION OF DPE IS 62 YEARS.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Director of Physical Education (DPE) in Vivekananda College, University of Delhi, challenged the decision of the University to superannuate her at the age of 62 years, contending that the age of superannuation for teachers in the University was 65 years and that she was entitled to the same benefit. The petitioner relied on various resolutions and communications issued by the University and the University Grants Commission (UGC) which, according to her, recognized DPEs as teachers and extended the benefit of enhanced age of superannuation to them.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the petitioner was not entitled to the benefit of enhanced age of superannuation as she was not a teacher within the meaning of the Delhi University Act, 1922. The Court noted that the Ordinances of the University made a clear distinction between the posts of DPE and teachers, and that the age of retirement for DPEs was fixed at 62 years by a resolution of the University's Executive Council. The Court also rejected the petitioner's argument that she was entitled to parity with teachers because she was equated with them for certain purposes, such as pay scales and career advancement schemes. The Court held that such benefits did not make DPEs teachers in law.
Issues: 1. Whether the petitioner, a DPE in Vivekananda College, University of Delhi, was entitled to the benefit of enhanced age of superannuation of 65 years applicable to teachers in the University. 2. Whether the petitioner was a teacher within the meaning of the Delhi University Act, 1922.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The age of superannuation of DPEs in the University of Delhi is 62 years, as fixed by a resolution of the University's Executive Council. 2. DPEs are not teachers within the meaning of the Delhi University Act, 1922, and are not entitled to the benefit of enhanced age of superannuation applicable to teachers.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was held to be liable to be superannuated at the age of 62 years.
JUDGMENT
V. Kameswar Rao, J. - CM. No. 27732/2021 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CM. No. 27731/2021 (for delay)
This is an application filed by the applicants / respondent Nos.2 & 3 seeking condonation of 8 days delay in filing the written submissions.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 5652/2019
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: -
"It is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this Petition and may issue:
a) Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, for quashing, setting aside the decision of the Respondent no. 2 with respect to the age of superannuation of the Petitioner being 62 years communicate to the Petitioner vide letter dated 27.03.2019 (Annexure P1) and further through letter a dated 22.04.2019 (Annexure P2) and declaring the same to be arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable, unconscionable, null and void;
b) Pass any other or such further orders which this Hon'ble Court me deem fit and proper."
2. It is contended by Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner worked in respondent No.2 / Vivekananda College, University of Delhi as a Director of Physical Education (DPE for short) from July 17, 1981, to July 15, 1983, and further on an ad hoc basic from July 18, 1983, to August 29, 1983. Thereafter, respondent No.2 / College came out with an advertisement for the post of DPE. In pursuance to the said advertisement, the petitioner, on July 13, 1983, applied for the said post with respondent No.2 / College.
3. Consequently, the petitioner herein was appointed to the post of DPE on a permanent and substantive basis. An agreement of service dated August 30, 1983, was also executed between respondent No.2 / College and the petitioner.
4. Mr. Dutta stated that the Executive Council (EC, for short) of the respondent No.1 / University of Delhi passed Resolution No.127 dated November 10, 1990, wherein the EC accepted the recommendation made by the Academic Council wherein the designation of DPE was changed to Lecturer in Physical Education and further described the duties and functions of Lecturer in Physical Education. The relevant portion of the Resolution is reproduced below: -
"Ref: EC Resolution no. 546 dated December 26, 1981.
The Council vide above Resolution accepted the following resolution: -
The Executive Council resolved to accept the Academic Council recommendation on the Director of Physical Education as mentioned in Item B-515.
The Council further resolved that the change of designation of Directors of Physical Education to that of Lecturers in Physical Education be processed according to the provisions contained in the Statutes and Ordinances of the University."
5. The Dy. Registrar (Colleges) vide its letter dated January 11, 1991, addressed to the respondent No.3 / Principal of the Vivekananda College, University of Delhi / conveyed Resolution No.127 dated November 10, 1990, wherein the designation of the DPE was changed to Lecturer in Physical Education. The relevant extract of the letter is reproduced below: -
"xxx xxx xxx
In pursuance to the Executive Council Resolution No. 127 dated 10.11.1990, I am directed to inform you that the recognized Directors of Physical Education in the Colleges will hereinafter be known as Lectures."
6. According to Mr. Dutta, the petitioner received a letter dated June 24 / 25, 1998, from respondent No.3 / Principal of Vivekananda College, whereby she was informed that she had been promoted to the post of Reader under merit promotion scheme with effect from July 18, 1994. In addition, respondent No.3 vide order dated April 09 / 13, 1999, informed the petitioner t
State of Karnataka vs. C.K.Pattamashetty & Anr. (2004) 6 SCC 685
B. Bharat Kumar and Ors. vs. Osmania University and Ors.
D.S.Nakara & Ors. vs. UOI & Ors. (1983) 1 SCC 305
P.S.Ramamohana Rao vs. A.P. Agricultural University & Anr. (1997) 5 SLR 106
Secretary, State of Karnataka and Ors. vs. Umadevi and Ors.
State of M.P. vs. Ramesh Chandra Bajpai (2009) 13 SCC 635
State of U.P. & Ors. vs. Hirendra Pal Singh (2011) 5 SCC 305
Physical education directors are categorized as non-teaching staff under University Ordinances, retaining a superannuation age of 62, despite claims of being treated as teachers for benefit purposes.
The promotions under the Merit Promotion Scheme were only financial upgradations and did not constitute substantive promotions. The EC Resolution No.127 dated 10.11.1990 was not approved by the Visit....
Person appointed as visiting professor on honorary basis, could not claim the financial benefits of the salaried employee of the University as a Lecturer or other teachers of the University.
Person appointed as visiting professor on honorary basis, could not claim the financial benefits of the salaried employee of the University as a Lecturer or other teachers of the University.
Article 309 of Constitution of India deals with conditions of Service which include age of superannuation.
The court established that the definition of 'Teacher' under the Uttar Pradesh University Act includes the petitioner, entitling him to retirement benefits at 65 years.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.