Narender @ Narender Yadav vs State of Haryana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(P&H) 69

N. S. SHEKHAWAT
Narender @ Narender Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Parshant Singh Chauhan, Mr. Ankur Lal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, with Mr. J.S Sohal, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

N.S. Shekhawat, J.

1. This order shall dispose off two bail petitions i.e CRM-M-31529-2023 titled as “Narender @ Narender Yadav Vs. State of Haryana” and CRM-M-47986-2023 titled as “Chetan Chauhan Vs. State of Haryana”, whereby the petitioners have prayed for anticipatory bail to them in case arising out of FIR No.195 dated 28.05.2023 registered under Sections 420,406 and 120-B of IPC, Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari, Haryana.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner namely Narender @ Narender Yadav (petitioner in CRM-M-31529-2023) contended that as per the allegations levelled by the complainant, Vikram Singh, co-accused had entered into an agreement to sell dated 08.01.2021 with the complainant, however, subsequently, Vikram Singh had sold his land to a lady namely Kavita Yadav vide the registered sale deed No.1957 dated 13.01.2021. Learned counsel further contended that the petitioner was merely an attesting witness of the agreement to sell dated 08.01.2021. Learned counsel further contended that it has been falsely alleged that the petitioner had received a sum of Rs.60,00,000/- in cash, which is highly unbelievable and the complainant had not been able to substa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document