HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Erfan Timber – Appellant
Versus
Balwinder Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Harpreet Singh Brar, J.
The present application under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter 'Cr.P.C.') is preferred against the impugned judgment of acquittal dated 16.11.2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Yamunanagar at Jagdhri in complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter 'NI Act').
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2. Briefly, the facts are that the applicant-complainant engaged in business of timber with the respondent-accused. In July 2016, the respondent placed an order for fuel wood with the applicant amounting to Rs.1,60,925/- against credit memo/bill no. 05 dated 16.07.2016, no. 06 dated 18.07.2016, no. 07 dated 20.07.2016, no. 08 dated 22.07.2016 and no. 09 dated 25.07.2016. To discharge his liability, the respondent issued a cheque bearing no. 353065 dated 17.08.2016 for a sum of Rs.1,60,000/-. On presentation, the cheque was dishnonoured vide memo dated 18.08.2016 with the remarks- 'Exceeds Arrangement.' Thereafter, a legal notice dated 26.08.2016 was issued to the respondent. Since the respondent failed to make the requisite payment, the present complaint was filed on 15.09.2016.
3. On finding a pr
Sumeet Vij v. M/s Paramount Tech Fab Industries
Uttam Ram v. Devinder Singh Hudan and Another
K.S. Ranganatha v. Vittal Shetty
M/s Gimpex Private Limited v. Manoj Goel
Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel v. State of Gujrat and Another
M.S. Narayana Menon alias Mani v. State of Kerala and Anr.
Kundan Lal Rallaram v. Custodian, Evacuee Property, Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.