SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1396

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
.... – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. A.K. Sharma, Mr. Anmol Malik DAG, Haryana

Table of Content
1. appeal against acquittal of sexual offence. (Para 1)
2. credibility of prosecutrix’s statement highlighted. (Para 2)
3. court's observations on evidence credibility. (Para 3 , 7)
4. factual background of the case. (Para 4 , 5)
5. trial court's proceedings and charges. (Para 6)
6. appellate court's power to re-evaluate evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
7. importance of prosecutrix's statement in sexual offences. (Para 11)
8. contradictions in prosecutrix's statements undermine credibility. (Para 12 , 13)
9. consensual relationship established; lack of evidence for claims. (Para 14 , 15)
10. delay in filing fir affects prosecutrix’s case. (Para 16 , 17)
11. summary of prosecutrix and respondent's relationship. (Para 18)
12. conclusion on evidence acceptance and acquittal. (Para 19)
13. final judgment dismissing the appeal and acquitting the respondent. (Para 20 , 21)

Judgment

Mr. Kuldeep Tiwari, J.

The instant appeal is directed against the order of acquittal dated 22.12.2021 rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, whereby, the respondent No.2 has been acquitted qua the charges framed against him, under Sections 354 (D), 376(2)(N), and, 506 of INDIAN PENAL CODE (hereinaft

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top