SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1380

ALKA SARIN
Mohinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kishan Lal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. R.K. Rana, Mr. Amit Jaiswal

Table of Content
1. facts relevant to ejectment petition (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding maintainability and ownership (Para 3 , 6)
3. court's analysis on personal necessity and landlord-tenant relationship (Para 5 , 8)
4. personal bona-fide necessity must be proven (Para 9)
5. revision petition dismissed (Para 10)

Judgment

Mrs. Alka Sarin, J.

The present revision petition has been preferred by the landlord-petitioners against the orders passed by both the Authorities below dismissing their ejectment petition.

2. The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the landlord-petitioner filed a petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Haryana Rent Act’) for ejectment of the tenant-respondent from property bearing nos.752 and 752/1, Bich Ki Diggi, Ambala Cantt. It was averred in the ejectment petition that the tenant-respondent took part of property no.752, Bich Ki Diggi, Ambala Cantt. on a rent @ Rs.200/- per month from the grandmother of the landlord-petitioners for his residential purpose and that the electricity and water charges were to be paid by the tenant-respondent. The tenant-respondent agreed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top