Judgment

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J. :-

Factual Background

1. The petitioner is the biological mother of the minor child Santosh @ Archit. Undisputedly, at the instant moment, the above minor child is in the custody of co-respondents No. 5 and 6, who became impleaded, as such, through an order made by this Court, on 22.02.2021, upon, CRM-W-140-2021.

2. The facts necessary which relate(s) to the assumption(s) of custody of the minor child Santosh @ Archit are that, co-respondents No. 5 and 6 assumed the custody of the above minor child, on May/June,2018 from one Anupam Muni, who is arrayed as co-respondent No. 4. The petitioner was at the relevant stage a disciple of co-respondent No. 4, and, since she had divorced her previous husband, therefore, co-respondent No. 4 persuaded her to marry his disciple Jagdish. The said marriage was solemnized on 10.02.2018. At the time of the petitioner solemnizing second marriage with Jagdish Rai, thus, she through Annexure R-4/1, handed over the custody of her minor child, to co-respondent No. 4. Annexure R-4/1 is claimed by co-respondent No. 4 to be signatured by the present petitioner. However, in the rejoinder filed by the petitioner to the reply of co-respondent No. 4, she submits that the said document is a false, and a forged document. She further denies the contents of Annexure R-4/1 being written by her or the same being signed by her. However, the said denial is left open to be made before the learned civil Court concerned, whereto, the parties have been relegated to make a recourse rather for claiming the ultimate/final custody of the minor child. The contents of Annexure R-4/1 are extracted hereinafter.

“I, Manisha, am resident of Nepal. Gurdev Sh. Anupam Muni, got my marriage held with Jagga Jagdish resident of Kalanwali. Due to this happiness, I give my son, Santosh to Gurdev Shri Anupam Muni and I am doing this work without any pressure. Now, I have no responsibility on it. Now, I have no right on him. Gurudev Shri Anupam Muni Ji is the owner of the same and after making him his disciple (son) and by bringing up him and by giving Dharam Sanskar to him, he will make him Jain Sant. Sd/- Manisha

Sd/- Anupam Muni.

3. Moreover, further the delivery of interim custody to co-respondents No. 5 and 6, has been granted by this Court, but after interacting with the minor child, and, thereby this Court concluding that the minor child is happy to reside in the company of co-respondents No. 5 and 6.

4. Co-respondents No. 5 and 6 plead, that since they were also disciples of co-respondent No. 4, and, since the present petitioner, had surrendered the minor child to co-respondent No. 4, through Annexure R-4/1. Thus, when there was none to take care of the minor child besides when the health of the minor child was frail. Resultantly co-respondent No. 4 entrusted the custody of the minor child to them in about May/June, 2018. They further plead that since then the minor child is being given the best care by them. Even the best medical care, is pleaded to be provided to the minor child, but as revealed by Annexure A-2, Annexure whereof becomes appended with their impleadment application. Moreover, Annexures R-5/3 and R-5/4, as appended with their reply, do suggest, that the said child has been admitted by them in Mango Blossoms Kids School, Begu Road, Sirsa, Haryana.

4. Co-respondent No. 4 also furnished his reply to the petition and though in the preliminary objections, he had claimed that the petition is mis-constituted and requires dismissal. Moreo